Volun-selected
Referees in America
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2018
- Messages
- 614
- Post Likes
- 364
- Location
- United States
- Current Referee grade:
- Level 8
Sorry guys, I’m overthinking it all again…
The laws are pretty clear that once a team awarded a penalty decides to kick at goal they are tied in.
8.20 If the team indicates to the referee the intention to kick at goal, they must kick at goal.
The laws are pretty clear that once a team awarded a penalty decides to kick at goal they are tied in.
8.20 If the team indicates to the referee the intention to kick at goal, they must kick at goal.
So what happens if a team changes their mind and decides to run down the clock? The next law has:
8.21 The kick must be taken within 60 seconds (playing time) from the time the team indicated their intention to do so, even if the ball rolls over and has to be placed again. Sanction: Kick is disallowed and a scrum is awarded.
60 seconds rolls past - and we have to award a scrum. The table under 19.1 has:
Infringement / stoppage | Location of scrum | Who throws in |
---|---|---|
A penalty attempt at goal not taken within the time limit. | In the scrum zone at the point closest to where the penalty was awarded. | The non-offending team. |
My question - who is the non-offending team? The current kicking team, the one that was originally awarded the penalty?
Or, since the kicking team have (IMO) deliberately ran down the clock and is now afoul of 20.5 A penalty or free-kick must be taken without delay.
Because of the deliberate shenanigans I’m thinking the latter, but I could easily see an irate coach and/or player from the kicking team wanting it to be the former.