If there is injury time off does the sin-bin time clock stop also?
If there is injury time off does the sin-bin time clock stop also?
Haldfway through what? A scrum is a different phase because different laws apply.
Time has not expired but the 10 minutes YC playing time has. The laws do not cover the situation, so the referee has to make a decision.
However this is going to be pretty rare, so I doubt if most refs will ever have thought about it in advance.
.
However this is going to be pretty rare, so I doubt if most refs will ever have thought about it in advance.
Last play.
Just because there is a PK and a team has opted for a scrum doesn't change the fact that it is still "last play" and the binned player has no right to take part as he was in the bin when "last play" commenced.
.
I'm surprised how sympathetic some are to binned players. They should not transgress the laws of the game if they don't want to be off the park.
I don't think he needs to, he just does the same as he would at any time in the game.
If it's a suitable break then the player can come back on, if it isn't he can't
That is an incorrect statement. There have been many instances of play carrying on well past 80 minutes.If he goes in the 71st minute I don't care what happens after that. There are only 9 minutes of playing-time remaining and therefore he cannot possibly come back, no matter what the circumstances.
There is no such thing as "last play" because a further PK might be awarded.Last play.
Just because there is a PK and a team has opted for a scrum doesn't change the fact that it is still "last play" and the binned player has no right to take part as he was in the bin when "last play" commenced.
No, he flipping can't!!!
somewhen before the 20 minutes of overtime ticked up on the clock, I would be blowing for a knock on.the absurdio thing ...
if a game managed to play 20 minutes "extra" because of a mixture of poor ability to break the defense, brilliant defence and an occassional PK award and ended up beong won after 20 minutes of extra time by the team without the man in the biin, do you really think it totally "fair" that the team with the man in the bin in effect had him binned for 29 minutes?
I am swayed by both arguments, but its this aspect that makes me very uncomfortable.
didds
somewhen before the 20 minutes of overtime ticked up on the clock, I would be blowing for a knock on.
Not sure anybody would be arguing with me,.
Ia a team opts for a scrum from a penalty award during normal play, would you refuse to allow a time-expired YC player to come back on for that scrum? It seems to be allowed without anybody raising questions.
.
to heap on another complication : if circumstances had meant that scrums have been forced to uncontested pending the return of the YC player
I was thinking along those lines.
What about the following situation: Red are 4 points down and have had a very dominant scrum throughout the game. A yellow front row (they don't have any other FR players on the bench) is YC'd on 71 minutes leading to uncontested scrums. On 82 minutes, Red are awarded a 5m penalty. The red captain asks you if, since 10 minutes has passed, the yellow FR can come back on for a contested scrum.
?
Don't they all say "But sir, it never was a..... .... "except perhaps the guy who didn't actually knock it on!
somewhen before the 20 minutes of overtime ticked up on the clock, I would be blowing for a knock on.
Not sure anybody would be arguing with me, after 100 minutes of intense defense.
My thinking is these same players have dawdled to every scrum and line-out, reducing effective playing time down to 50 minutes. And now all of a sudden they wake up, 20 minutes in the red.