Who are the most prolific posters to date ie., weekly average?:hap:
Who are the most prolific posters to date ie., weekly average?:hap:
Who are the most prolific posters to date ie., weekly average?:hap:
Who are the most prolific posters to date ie., weekly average?:hap:
27/12/2011 | ||||
Poster | Start Date | Days | Posts | Average |
Chopper | 26/08/2007 | 1584 | 5604 | 3.537879 |
Simon T | 03/12/2003 | 2946 | 9206 | 3.124915 |
OB | 07/10/2004 | 2637 | 13,791 | 5.229807 |
Davet | 27/01/2004 | 2891 | 8017 | 2.773089 |
:clap::clap::clap::biggrin::hap::sad: . . . . never mind.
:clap::clap::clap:
You have the date the poster started, the number of posts - both shown on the left of the message
use Excel - subtract start date from today to get number of days, divide in to total posts = average
well, that would be the MEAN average of course.
You could otherwise do some very tedious work finding out for each poster how many posts they made per day for every day of their RRF existence and take the middle number to garner their MEDIAN average number of posts. Or indeed create a tally chart of posts per day (see median working) and take the highest tally of those PPD to work out the MODE average.didds
Does that mean I wouldn't be first, didds? :sad:
You're not first anyway. The list wasn't in order
Dude come on, read a book. Make an effort. You're listed first on the list. Clearly, if you look over at the "AVERAGE" column, you can see you're not the one with the highest average-posts per day. This isnt a pissing contest here; I'm just totally surprised that, based on being able to read actual data, you cant figure this out. Is this an iPad issue? I'm not taking the piss here, I just dont see how you miss it when the data is well organized (on my PC) and is pretty clear. Or did you just blow your load early without looking at the data b/c you saw you were the first name listed?Thanks, Davet, for the info . . . and would you b'lieve, it was little old' me being the most prolific?
Where, in the above posts, is there anyone being "mean"?What surprised me most, however, was the unashamed meanness of spirit my post provoked. A reflection on a person's character perhaps?
I'm clearly missing what you think the 3 claps were for, and I what I think they were for. I guess the only one that really knows is OB. :shrug:Never-the-less OB certainly didn't portray such sourness - and he came third- he generously gave me no less than three claps. Much appreciated Ol' Timer.:hap: