Why not have both?
What do you think that outcome will be of criminal action?
Caution?
Trip to the magistrates and a £25 fine?
Didds you understanding is the same as mine.You could indeed have both. AIUI any civil action will be postponed until any criminal action has run its course. Civil actions have a lower level of proof required (balance of probablity versus beyond reasonable doubt ). Though in this case there would be little to doubt.
The criminal action may be little more than a caution rather than a prosecution. Though given the adult versus child angle - maybe not so. Somebody better versed in day tio day criminal law would be far better to advise us all It would however still be on a criminal record, which may "encourage" the perp to not do it again.
???
didds
RFU imposed a two year ban (one year suspended)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-union/27604560
makes fullerians six match ban look pretty shabby.
it's a small world, Browner, personally I doubt he'll be trying to watch games incognito, and if he did do so, I think he'd be quickly noticed, and I really doubt that his club would be willing to turn a blind eye.
My thought exactly. Can he watch from the DBL? From behind a rope? From 10 yards back from the touchline? In the stand? Is he banned from Twickenham and Allianz Park?It was more a question as to where a touchline begins and ends for the purposes of being banned from it?
Publicly it sends the right message
But say little Jonny is driven to opposition club xxxxxxx next season, presumably dad sits in bar / car and his wandering around the site is unrestricted in general .
What happens if he watches the match from further back from the "touchline" or from it .... Then what?