That's a very clear explanation of the Law from the ARU
Worth noting that that memo came out in 2011 (at which time this thread had already been running a year!) . Recipients might have been forgiven for thinking that something had just changed in 2011 on leggings. But of course the IRB definition of underwear had come out five years previously , in 2006. So ARU were not relaying anything new, but explaining an existing, but slightly obscure, situation.
Also worth a smile that just eighteen months after the ARU memo explaining how the existing Laws made leggings illegal, the RFU would issue their Touchline memo explaining that under the existing laws leggings were OK.
Worth noting that that memo came out in 2011 (at which time this thread had already been running a year!) . Recipients might have been forgiven for thinking that something had just changed in 2011 on leggings. But of course the IRB definition of underwear had come out five years previously , in 2006. So ARU were not relaying anything new, but explaining an existing, but slightly obscure, situation.
Also worth a smile that just eighteen months after the ARU memo explaining how the existing Laws made leggings illegal, the RFU would issue their Touchline memo explaining that under the existing laws leggings were OK.